Search found 5 matches
- Sat May 31, 2014 3:40 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Few question on .sys license protection
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11425
Re: Few question on .sys license protection
so why tell people to contact you in the examples if we need it... VMProtectDDK.h #pragma once #ifdef _WIN64 #pragma comment(lib, "VMProtectDDK64.lib") #else #pragma comment(lib, "VMProtectDDK32.lib") #endif #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif // protection __declspe...
- Wed May 28, 2014 9:44 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Few question on .sys license protection
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11425
Re: Few question on .sys license protection
Can i have an answer to this please.
thx
thx
- Mon May 26, 2014 7:51 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Few question on .sys license protection
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11425
Re: Few question on .sys license protection
Yeh but it is problematic, i want the license protection. it says its possible an one of the examples...
- Wed May 21, 2014 9:09 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Few question on .sys license protection
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11425
Re: Few question on .sys license protection
Wrote this once but your site 404'd, ahh well. Does that mean we need to re-purchase 3? I have 2.09 still... It does say in the examples that if we need license protection for drivers then we should ask. Mutation only for drivers is not really good, the VM is difficult to manage, well in my projects...
- Mon May 19, 2014 7:39 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Few question on .sys license protection
- Replies: 8
- Views: 11425
Few question on .sys license protection
hi, recently purchased and currently just mutating my driver however as there is no driver loader I cannot safely distribute to end users and really need the licensing to work. I am used to using winlicense in the past where the generators are exported and no need to make them from the examples whic...