VMProtect Software » Forum

Admin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 5:50 am VMProtect doesn't support binaries compiled with Native AOT because AOT uses return address from the stack for GC.

Sorry to hear that. We hope to have a solution for this in the future. We were just planning to use NativeAOT.

I compile it again use same original exe and same VMP config on same computer. this time it runs well.

sorry

Thanks for fast response 2126, the same example, could you please have a look? public static int TestEvent() { var eventExample = new EventExample(); eventExample.ExampleEvent += () => eventExample.Counter++; eventExample.RaiseEvent(); eventExample.RaiseEvent(); return eventExample.Counter; } System...

Hello, following code can't be run on 2119, .net 4.8.1 Thank you for your help System.InvalidOperationException [Obfuscation(Feature = "virtualization", Exclude = false)] public static string GetMD5_32(string ConvertString) { var md5 = new MD5CryptoServiceProvider(); byte[] t = md5.Compute...

Hello Admin
2110 look solved this problem,

but this one:
public void UnsafeMethod()
{
int* ptr = stackalloc int[1];
*ptr = 42;
Console.WriteLine("Unsafe method: " + *ptr);
}

got error on build 2110, runs well on build 2025, could you please have a look?

antoher issue:
DivideByZeroException inside VM, .net framework 4.6.1
after upgraded to 4.8, problem solved.

just report here, we will ask user to use latest version.

[del]build 2040 memory leak, It takes 10+GB memory before GC. VMMap can see a very large private data.
build 2025 do not have this problem.

Not found minimal code to reproduce the problem yet.

[/del]

Maybe our mistake still look into it

did you try .NET vmprotect sdk?
Located at Lib\windows\Net\VMProtect.SDK.dll

Admin wrote: ↑Tue Apr 02, 2024 8:24 am Because you have to rremove the force renaming feature for all classes with dynamic calls!

Yes, I removed all renaming feature

Thank you for the clarification. We are using the renaming attribute solely as a workaround for the main issue at original post. However, the current problem persists even without any renaming tags, as dynamics are still encountering issues. so the problem is RuntimeBinderException and JSON property...

a more serious problem: When we use we mentioned workaround at the topic: Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: “F6B57532” does not contains a defination for "testCallWithDynamicClass" [assembly: Obfuscation(Feature = "renaming", Exclude = true)] namespace XXX { ...

Please show me how you use serialization for such types. public static dynamic testAnonymousType2() { var obj = new { Name = "John", Age = 30 }; var converter = new System.Web.Script.Serialization.JavaScriptSerializer(); Console.WriteLine("ToJSON1: " + converter.Serialize(obj));...

following code throws Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException class XXX does not contain a definition for "Name" no assembly level renaming Obfuscation attribute [Obfuscation(Feature = "ultra", Exclude = true)] public static dynamic testAnonymousType2() { var obj = ...

when enabling renaming, following code: public static dynamic testAnonymousType() { var obj = new { Name = "John", Age = 30 }; return obj; } The properties Name and Age are also renamed due to the compiler generating internal classes and private fields. This behavior can lead to issues wit...