Search found 2708 matches
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 9:18 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: 3.9.5.2369 VMProtectGetCurrentHWID cause BSOD
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4507
Re: 3.9.5.2369 VMProtectGetCurrentHWID cause BSOD
Fixed in the 2371 build
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 9:17 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: 3.9.5.2366 cann't protect sys file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8506
Re: 3.9.5.2366 cann't protect sys file
Fixed in the 2371 build
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:19 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Performance Impact of Protection Modes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 11696
Re: Performance Impact of Protection Modes
1. "Mutation" doesn't protect your code against reversing. The goal of this method is changing code signatures. 2. "Virtualization" converts your code to VM instructions. The speed decreases by about 1000 - 10000 times. Don't recommend to use this method for big loops. 3. "U...
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 8:06 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15143
Re: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
Try the following code:
Code: Select all
local vmp_core = vmprotect.core()
local watermark_name = "BUILD_INFO"
local watermark_data = "12321312"
vmp_core:watermarks():add(watermark_name, watermark_data)
print("Watermark has been generated!")
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:47 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15143
Re: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
What is your registered email?
- Thu Jun 05, 2025 2:23 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
- Replies: 7
- Views: 15143
Re: Automaticly generating watermark for each user
Are you a registered user?
- Wed Jun 04, 2025 4:13 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: 3.9.5.2366 cann't protect sys file
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8506
Re: 3.9.5.2366 cann't protect sys file
Could you provide a test example (original SYS + MAP/PDB + VMP files) that shows your problem?
- Wed May 21, 2025 9:57 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Is VMProtectDecryptStringA/W thread-safe?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 29740
Re: Is VMProtectDecryptStringA/W thread-safe?
Yes, these API are thread-safe. You don't need to add a mutex there.
- Wed May 21, 2025 7:15 am
- Forum: Offtopic
- Topic: Девачки обиделись на страйки на YouTube
- Replies: 0
- Views: 53532
Девачки обиделись на страйки на YouTube
https://x.com/rhotav/status/1924409282910355668 https://x.com/allthingsida/status/1924451523767279893 https://x.com/herrcore/status/1924460424100991337 Добро пожаловать в ваш "демократический" западный мир. P.S. Аффтары умершего VTIL вытерли "облысевшим" девачкам сопли и выкатили...
- Sun May 18, 2025 6:36 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect 3.9.4 build 2275 MSVC C++ Exception handling not called
- Replies: 3
- Views: 16786
Re: VMProtect 3.9.4 build 2275 MSVC C++ Exception handling not called
Fixed in the 2359 build.
- Wed May 14, 2025 1:11 pm
- Forum: Purchasing or Upgrading
- Topic: Could you send me the latest version?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 54519
- Wed May 14, 2025 12:45 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect Demo 3.9.4 : ошибка ...unregistered version of VMProtect
- Replies: 2
- Views: 8228
- Thu May 08, 2025 6:42 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Unity 6 Client Slow Startup with Memory Protection
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10144
Re: Unity 6 Client Slow Startup with Memory Protection
The problem occurs while GameAssembly.dll fills own strunctures in the ".fptable" section. It calls VirtualProtect every time and VMProtect checks the list of protected regions, so the speed is much slower than without protection. Anyway, this behavior of GameAssembly is very strange becau...
- Sun May 04, 2025 9:23 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: How can encrypt in ARM64 with VMProtect?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 6201
Re: How can encrypt in ARM64 with VMProtect?
VMProtect doesn't support ARM64 binaries.
- Wed Apr 30, 2025 3:20 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Address is already used by function error
- Replies: 3
- Views: 9512
Re: Address is already used by function error
viewtopic.php?p=37678
P.S. You have to use code markers only when you need to protect a part of "large" function. In other cases the protection by function name from MAP/PDB is more secure:
https://vmpsoft.com/vmprotect/user-manu ... -a-project
P.S. You have to use code markers only when you need to protect a part of "large" function. In other cases the protection by function name from MAP/PDB is more secure:
https://vmpsoft.com/vmprotect/user-manu ... -a-project