MAP/PDB aren't required for .NET files because .NET files already contain all symbols inside.Compile the program without the debug information, but in the linker settings we enable creating of the MAP-file
Search found 2584 matches
- Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:44 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 596
Re: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 10:06 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Еще раз про hwid в новом VMProtect (3.8.7)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 416
Re: Еще раз про hwid в новом VMProtect (3.8.7)
Я вижу следующее решение своей проблемы - вы сами добавляете к HWID любые необходимые данные, в том числе и предыдущий алгоритм подсчета CPUID: enum BlockType { BLOCK_CPU, BLOCK_HOST, BLOCK_MAC, BLOCK_HDD, }; ... int info[4]; __cpuid(info, 1); if ((info[0] & 0xFF0) == 0xFE0) info[0] ^= 0x20; // ...
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 7:41 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtectIsDebuggerPresent on v3.8.8.2040
- Replies: 4
- Views: 350
Re: VMProtectIsDebuggerPresent on v3.8.8.2040
The size of "bool" is one byte, so 0x100 is equal "false"
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 7:29 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtectIsDebuggerPresent on v3.8.8.2040
- Replies: 4
- Views: 350
Re: VMProtectIsDebuggerPresent on v3.8.8.2040
Show me your VMProtectIsDebuggerPresent declaration.
- Wed Apr 10, 2024 5:42 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Еще раз про hwid в новом VMProtect (3.8.7)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 416
Re: Еще раз про hwid в новом VMProtect (3.8.7)
Господа, еще раз повторю, что уже неоднократно говорилось на этом форуме - HWID был сделан исключительно для использования внутри системы лицензирования (привязанные к HWID серийники продолжают работать без каких либо проблем). Если вы почему-то решили, что HWID можно использовать как-то по-другому,...
- Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:21 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 596
Re: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
It seems you work in the test mode:
https://vmpsoft.com/vmprotect/user-manu ... pplication
For real mode you have to protect your application with vmprotect.
https://vmpsoft.com/vmprotect/user-manu ... pplication
For real mode you have to protect your application with vmprotect.
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:29 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1365
Re: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
Названия переменных "слетают" (Я так понял вместо названий идёт их hex адрес) Это не названия переменных слетают, а vmprotect их переименовывает (опция "Удалять отладочную информацию"). В выходном MAP файле сохраняется информация о новых и старых именах для работы с "Stack ...
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 2:04 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1365
Re: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
Просьба в архивы включать в том числе и откомпилированные бинарники.
- Mon Apr 08, 2024 12:19 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 596
Re: Can we use VMProtect offline in dotnet C#?
We have tried using VMProtect.SDK but the functions in the SDK always fails. Could you provide more detailed information about this problem? So far we have attempted the following: import VMProtectSDK64.dll into the c# project (example below) writing a wrapper dll to call VMProtect functions in C++...
- Fri Apr 05, 2024 1:06 pm
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Driver Protection results in Error: 193 (When loading with SC)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 252
Re: Driver Protection results in Error: 193 (When loading with SC)
You have to ask the Microsoft support directly about this error.I am getting this error: 193
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:35 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect .NET5 под Linux
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3037
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:51 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1365
Re: Защита .NET бинарников под Linux
В версии 3.8.7.2037 добавлена поддержка .NET для Linux (не путать с NET Framework под Mono).
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:44 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: VMProtect for ARM64
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7129
Re: VMProtect for ARM64
Unfortunately we have no any news about ARM64.
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 8:24 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Is it Possible to Prevent Renaming for Returned Anonymous Classes
- Replies: 8
- Views: 340
Re: Is it Possible to Prevent Renaming for Returned Anonymous Classes
Because you have to rremove the force renaming feature for all classes with dynamic calls!
P.S. The topic is closed.
P.S. The topic is closed.
- Tue Apr 02, 2024 8:00 am
- Forum: Technical questions
- Topic: Is it Possible to Prevent Renaming for Returned Anonymous Classes
- Replies: 8
- Views: 340
Re: Is it Possible to Prevent Renaming for Returned Anonymous Classes
I have already wrote that the following code works like force renaming : [Obfuscation(Feature = "renaming", Exclude = false)] Force renaming means that all symbols (including methods) pinned to this attribute will be renaming even the methods were used for dynamic calls. Please don't use t...